Abracadabra: Language, Memory, Representation |
|
DraculaWhy read Dracula?
Dracula (and Frankenstein) can be read as figures which illustrate social life (in this case, of 19th century England). Frankenstein, for instance, as a story of anxiety about the individual in industrial capitalism, or more commonly about the dangers of science out of control. Dracula, is perhaps a parable of sexuality out of control, or of fears about "the East" and the mixing of cultures. Both stories have been repeated so often and in so many forms, that it is hard to say that Frankenstein and Dracula are really about any one thing. The figures, like the vampire itself, have taken over. There are novels galore (Anne Rice, Stephen King, Poppy Z. Brite, Whitley Streiber, etc). stage productions, 100s of different movies and television versions (of Dracula alone). If we consider not just Dracula, but vampires in general there are whole sub-cultures, tv shows, role-playing games, video games, cosmetics, wines and toys devoted to Dracula and Frankenstein is testament to their symbolic power on modern imagination. Today, it might be that said that even vampires have achieved equal rights, in the form of Buffy. Thanks to American Media, the figure of the vampire is something familiar even to the supposedly most distant cultures. Consider these news reports about the use of the figure of the vampire to protest George W. Bush's war. Perhaps the most central meaning of the myth of both Dracula and Frankenstein is as a story of human-ness (and also, of humanism). Frankenstein
Dracula
Memory, language, science and technology in Dracula?
|
|
Christopher M. Kelty Last modified: Wed Apr 9 08:19:54 CDT 2003 |